證監會向三家經紀行發出限制通知書以禁止它們在與涉嫌市場失當行為有關的客戶帳戶內作出上市衍生權證的買賣盤
The SFC sketches allegations that a trader bought warrants, then bid up the underlying stock, then sold warrants, then sold the stock, and somehow made a profit repeating this pattern despite the often-wide spreads in DWs. In our view a binding order can never be false, and the SFC should not encourage the fallacy that bids and offers in the market should provide a predictive price signal to investors. They are no more than bids and offers capable of being executed. The investigation continues - but aren't there better things on which to spend limited enforcement resources? 證監會描述指控的內容是炒家買認購證,然後炒起正股,再把輪賣掉,並在認股證一些買賣差價較大情況重覆這個獲利模式。在我們的角度,一個限價盤可能永遠不會假,這招證監會應是不鼓勵市場買賣盤的錯價能夠提供投資者可預測的買賣訊號。這樣或會做成買賣盤不能實行。調查繼續的話-但這是否利用有限調查資源調查一些好的東西?

會員: greatsoup 於2019-01-08 22:52:40 發表
原文網址: https://www.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/TC/news-and-announcements/news/doc?refNo=19PR1 上一篇 下一篇

官方留言